Essay
A researcher was interested in determining whether more frequent breaks (i.e., "coffee breaks") in a business setting would help employees to be more productive. With the cooperation of the management, employees on one floor of the corporate offices were allowed to take a 10-minute break each hour (at any time) between 8:00 and 11:00 A.M. (for a total of 30 minutes). The comparison group comprised employees on different floors who followed the usual corporate policy of taking a 30-minute break sometime during the morning (at any time). Measures of productivity were gathered for each employee according to his or her job (e.g., number of reports written, number of sales made, etc.). A time series analysis was applied to compare the productivity of both groups of employees for six months before and after the intervention (started in July). Quite surprisingly, the productivity of both groups increased following the onset of the intervention, suggesting to the researcher that the timing of breaks makes no difference.
-Describe one threat to internal validity that might be present in this study because the independent variable manipulation was implemented on different floors of the building.What information would you need to know in order to rule out this threat to internal validity?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A researcher was asked to evaluate the
Q4: The main problem associated with subject attrition
Q5: When it comes to control over the
Q6: After implementing a program to improve admitting
Q7: A physician wants to test the effectiveness
Q9: An intervention in an office setting leads
Q10: In the context of conducting experiments in
Q11: A researcher was interested in determining whether
Q14: Perhaps the greatest difference between basic research
Q18: Why is the nonequivalent control group design