In Custom Vehicles V

Multiple Choice

In Custom Vehicles v.Forest River,Custom sued because Forest used the term "Work and Play" to describe a van they manufactured after Custom had registered the mark "Work-N-Play" to describe a vehicle they had built.The court found no trademark infringement because:

A) Work-N-Play had not acquired a secondary meaning so as to qualify as a suggestive trademark.
B) Work-N-Play was not distinctive enough to qualify as a fanciful trademark.
C) Work-N-Play was not distinctive enough to qualify as an arbitrary trademark.
D) Work-N-Play had not acquired a secondary meaning so as to qualify as a descriptive trademark