True/False
The case of Mattison v.Johnston held that competition is not a valid excuse to break a restrictive covenant that was created to avoid just such practices and that inducing someone to break a restrictive covenant is tortious conduct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q21: In Palsgraf v.Long Island Railroad Co.,would the
Q22: The point at which liability for negligence
Q23: Which of the following is not true
Q24: Which of the following situations is not
Q26: Finley is a United States Senator.While at
Q27: Rita Reporter works for a major news
Q28: Fred has a toothache and is driving
Q30: Name the various categories of torts and
Q32: Courts enforce fraudulent misrepresentation for intentional lies
Q38: The civil counterpart to theft is:<br>A) conversion.<br>B)