Essay
At a large university,a group of education specialists tested the effectiveness of a new academic improvement course.Students seeking help at the university counseling center because of academic difficulties were asked to participate in this 4-week program.Only students who were judged to be deficient in reading comprehension and other study-related skills were chosen for the program.Students who sought help at the counseling center for emotional difficulties were included in the study as a comparison group.These students received the usual treatment offered at the counseling center.A group of 30 students completed the academic-improvement program at the counseling center.Average test grades from the students' courses for the two groups were compared before (midterm exams)and after (final exams)the program.Analyses revealed that a statistically significant majority of the students were doing better in school after completing the academic-improvement program than before.
Identify and describe two threats to internal validity in this study.That is,show why there are at least two plausible alternative hypotheses for the obtained change in grades other than due to the academic-improvement program.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A clinical psychologist examined the effect of
Q2: When people's performance changes because they are
Q4: Even when pretest scores are the same,on
Q5: When,from the outset of an experiment,differences exist
Q6: The effect of a treatment in a
Q7: One factor that may make it difficult
Q8: Strong evidence of a treatment effect in
Q9: A psychologist tests the effect of an
Q10: A human services agency was interested in
Q11: A researcher trains observers to complete checklists