Matching
Select the best matching for each term
Premises:
gross negligence
record retention
litigation hold
retention policy
spoliation
proportionality
sanctions
e-discovery
adverse inference
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Responses:
Weighing the cost against the benefits of preserving and obtaining evidence.
An extreme level of carelessness.
A process whereby a company or individual determines that an unresolved dispute may result in litigation and, as a result, documents should not be destroyed or altered.
Destruction of records that may be relevant to ongoing or anticipated litigation, government investigation, or audit.
Discovery of documents created, disseminated, and stored via electronic means.
Punishment ordered by a judge for violating a court order, or court rules.
the discovery of electronic information
Keeping documents and electronically stored information for a period of time.
revised for the first time in 2006 to address e-discovery
allows the jury to infer that the evidence would have been damaging
Correct Answer:
Premises:
Responses:
gross negligence
record retention
litigation hold
retention policy
spoliation
proportionality
sanctions
e-discovery
adverse inference
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Premises:
gross negligence
record retention
litigation hold
retention policy
spoliation
proportionality
sanctions
e-discovery
adverse inference
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Responses:
Related Questions
Q2: _ is the destruction of evidence pertaining
Q3: Matching<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB3868/.jpg" alt="Matching "
Q4: Destruction of records when the party knows
Q5: A litigation hold is a requirement that
Q6: What is spoilation? How may an attorney
Q8: Spoilation of evidence is punishable by court
Q10: _ refers to the discovery of documents
Q11: The duty to preserve evidence dictates that
Q12: The opinions in Zubulake<br>A) have been replaced
Q46: Judge Shira Scheindlin in the widely-reported Zubulake