In the "Fund of Funds" Case,the Plaintiff Contended That

Multiple Choice

In the "Fund of Funds" case,the plaintiff contended that:

A) The defendant CPA firm owed it due care in performing professional services and failed to do so
B) The defendant CPA firm violated the Integrity and Objectivity Rule
C) The defendant CPA firm pursued its own self-interest over the public interest
D) The defendant CPA firm had a duty to utilize all available information in performing professional services for the plaintiff