Multiple Choice
The advantage of using heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors is that
A) they are easier to compute than the homoskedasticity-only standard errors.
B) they produce asymptotically valid inferences even if you do not know the form of the conditional variance function.
C) it makes the OLS estimator BLUE, even in the presence of heteroskedasticity.
D) they do not unnecessarily complicate matters, since in real-world applications, the functional form of the conditional variance can easily be found.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Your textbook states that an implication
Q2: If the errors are heteroskedastic, then<br>A)the OLS
Q3: The large-sample distribution of <span
Q4: "One should never bother with WLS. Using
Q5: For this question you may assume
Q7: The extended least squares assumptions are of
Q8: If, in addition to the least squares
Q9: Assume that var(u<sub>i</sub>|X<sub>i</sub>)= ?<sub>0</sub>+?<sub>1</sub> <sub> </sub>
Q10: (Requires Appendix material)Your textbook considers various
Q11: In practice, you may want to use