Multiple Choice
The original reactor built in 1942 was just "barely" critical because the natural uranium that was used contained less than 1% of the fissionable isotope U-235 (half life 713 million years) .What if,in 1942,the Earth had been 9 billion years old instead of 4.5 billion years old? Would this reactor have reached critical stage with natural uranium? Why?
A) No.The age of the Earth has nothing to do with the reactor reaching critical stage with U-235.
B) No.1% of the fissionable isotope U-235 is insufficient for the reactor to reach critical stage no matter what the age of the Earth.
C) Yes.If the Earth had been twice as old there would have then been twice as much fissionable U-235 present and the reactor would have reached critical stage.
D) No.The increased age of the Earth would mean that there would be a much smaller percentage of U-235,thus not enough for the reactor to reach critical stage.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: The image below shows a beam of
Q38: If a material has a half-life of
Q39: What are some of the optimistic worldwide
Q40: What evidence supports the contention that the
Q41: Which of the following statements about radiation
Q43: Which of the following is a major
Q44: Why will nuclear fission probably not be
Q45: When <span class="ql-formula" data-value="\begin{array} {
Q46: Complete the following nuclear equation:
Q47: How is it possible for an element