Essay
Zerlie's Imports purchased automotive parts from a German firm on July 1, 2016.The parts cost 150,000 Euros to be paid for on August 15.To pay for the parts, Zerlie's Imports borrowed 150,000 euros from a German bank on July 16.The loan bears an 11% interest rate to be repaid on August 15 in euros.
?
Another option would have been for Zerlie's to have hedged the purchase with a forward exchange contract on July 1 to buy 150,000 euros at a forward rate of $0.67.Exchange rates were as follows:
?
?
Required:
?
a.Compute the effect on net income assuming the following:
?
?
?
?
?
?
(1)
Zerlie did not borrow to pay for the transaction or hedge the transaction on July 1.?
?
(2)
Zerlie borrowed from the German bank on July 16.?
?
(3)
Zerlie hedged the full purchase on July 1.?
?
** ignore present values and discount rates
?
?
?
b.Determine which of these three alternatives would have been the best for Zerlie under the situation described.?
Correct Answer:

Verified
a.

b. Zerlie would have been...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
b. Zerlie would have been...
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q61: Bulldog Enterprise, a U.S.firm, agreed on
Q62: A 60-day contract has a value today
Q63: Discuss the differences in using an option
Q64: Wolters Corporation is a U.S.corporation that
Q65: Wolters Corporation is a U.S.corporation that
Q67: A U.S.company that has sold its product
Q68: A hedge fund is similar to a
Q69: Happ, Inc.agreed to purchase merchandise from
Q70: Which of the following is not true
Q71: On January 1, 2016, a domestic