Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is This passage from cnn.com contains an argument. This issue is whether online searching will improve neural activity for all older adults. The conclusion is that online searching will improve neural activity for all older adults. The premise is that online searching improved neural activity in the participants of a recent study of 24 people between the ages of 55-78 at UCLA.
This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that online searching improved neural activity in the participants of a recent study of 24 people between the ages of 55-78 at UCLA. The first premise is that members of the technologically advanced group in the study at UCLA had more than twice the neural activation than their less experienced counterparts while searching online. The second premise is that the only difference between the two groups of participants in the UCLA study of neural activity was their technological experience.
The argument is an inductive generalization. The argument is weak because the sample size is small and there is no indication that the sample is representative of the target.
A study at UCLA suggests that 1. searching online could be beneficial for the brain of older adults. 2. The researchers studied 24 people between the ages of 55-78. 3. The participants were divided into two groups: one that had minimal computer experience and another that was Web savvy. 4.Members of the technologically advanced group had more than twice the neural activation than their less experienced counterparts while searching online. 5. The only difference between the two groups was their technological experience. Thus, since 6. online searching improved neural activity in the participants of this study, it is likely that 1. online searching will improve neural activity for all older adults.

This passage from cnn.com contains an argument. This issue is whether online searching will improve neural activity for all older adults. The conclusion is that online searching will improve neural activity for all older adults. The premise is that online searching improved neural activity in the participants of a recent study of 24 people between the ages of 55-78 at UCLA. This passage contains a subargument. The intermediate conclusion is that online searching improved neural activity in the participants of a recent study of 24 people between the ages of 55-78 at UCLA. The first premise is that members of the technologically advanced group in the study at UCLA had more than twice the neural activation than their less experienced counterparts while searching online. The second premise is that the only difference between the two groups of participants in the UCLA study of neural activity was their technological experience. The argument is an inductive generalization. The argument is weak because the sample size is small and there is no indication that the sample is representative of the target. A study at UCLA suggests that 1. searching online could be beneficial for the brain of older adults. 2. The researchers studied 24 people between the ages of 55-78. 3. The participants were divided into two groups: one that had minimal computer experience and another that was Web savvy. 4.Members of the technologically advanced group had more than twice the neural activation than their less experienced counterparts while searching online. 5. The only difference between the two groups was their technological experience. Thus, since 6. online searching improved neural activity in the participants of this study, it is likely that 1. online searching will improve neural activity for all older adults.

Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Essay

Correct Answer:
Verified

Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Essay

Correct Answer:VerifiedShow Answer

Correct Answer:
Verified