Multiple Choice
Edgar Co.acquired 60% of Kindall Co.on January 1,2009.During 2009,Edgar made several sales of inventory to Kindall.The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000,respectively.Kindall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2009.Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2009 was $2,140,000.How would consolidated cost of goods sold have differed if the inventory transfers had been for the same amount and cost,but from Kindall to Edgar?
A) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been $2,140,000.
B) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been $2,175,000.
C) The effect on consolidated cost of goods sold cannot be predicted from the information provided.
D) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been reduced because of the noncontrolling interest in the subsidiary.
E) Consolidated cost of goods sold would have been higher because of the noncontrolling interest in the subsidiary.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: During 2009,Edwards Co.sold inventory to its parent
Q14: REFERENCE: Ref.05_11<br>Pepe,Incorporated acquired 60% of Devin Company
Q15: REFERENCE: Ref.05_08<br>On January 1,2009,Smeder Company,an 80% owned
Q17: REFERENCE: Ref.05_10<br>Stark Company,a 90% owned subsidiary of
Q19: On January 1,2009,Race Corp.acquired 80% of the
Q20: REFERENCE: Ref.05_14<br>On January 1,2009,Musial Corp.sold equipment to
Q21: McGraw Corp.owned all of the voting common
Q23: On January 1,2009,Payton Co.sold equipment to its
Q51: Compute consolidated sales.<br>A) $10,000,000.<br>B) $10,126,000.<br>C) $10,140,000.<br>D) $10,200,000.<br>E)
Q105: Assume the same information, except Shannon sold