Multiple Choice
Compare two situations. (A) A firm is not legally responsible for damages that result from air pollution caused by its production of steel. (B) A firm is legally responsible for damages that result from its production of steel. Ronald Coase argued that
A) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm will result in little reduction of pollution in either situation (A) or (B) because the firm has greater economic and political power than the victims.
B) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm would lead to a greater reduction in pollution in situation (A) than situation (B) .
C) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm would lead to a smaller reduction in pollution in situation (A) than situation (B) .
D) bargaining between the firm and the victims of the air pollution caused by the firm would lead to an equal reduction in pollution in situation (A) and situation (B) .
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q65: Which of the following describes how a
Q160: Figure 5-2<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Figure 5-2
Q173: <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB3018/.jpg" alt=" Coal burning utilities
Q174: Figure 5-13<br> <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4193/.jpg" alt="Figure 5-13
Q192: A modern example of the tragedy of
Q207: Private costs<br>A)are borne by producers of a
Q220: Which of the following must be present
Q227: An externality is an example of a
Q236: Explain how mandatory seat belt laws may
Q247: How does the construction of a market