Multiple Choice
Rudy files a suit against Shakes & Shingles, Roofing Contractor, Inc., under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Rudy must show that
A) he justifiably refused to fulfill a promise to Shakes & Shingles.
B) he justifiably relied on Shakes & Shingles' promise to his detriment.
C) Shakes & Shingles justifiably refused to fulfill a promise to him.
D) Shakes & Shingles justifiably relied on his promise to its detriment.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: Promissory estoppel requires that justice will be
Q15: Forbearance is the act of refraining from
Q15: A covenant not to sue does not
Q16: For consideration to have "legally sufficient value,"
Q17: A promise by one party to pay
Q20: Fact Pattern 13-3<br>Sal contracts with Tasty Pizza
Q36: Molly's motorcycle is damaged in an accident
Q42: Under a contract with Valley Vineyard, Walsh
Q52: Essentially, adequacy of consideration concerns the fairness
Q69: Jenny promises to pay Kay $500 because