Essay
Suppose two point sources are discharging phosphorus into Wisconsin's Fox River and face the following abatement costs for this pollutant:
Point Source 1: TAC1 = 500 + 0.35(A1)2
MAC1 = 0.7A1
Point Source 2: TAC2 = 750 + 1.05(A2)2
MAC2 = 2.1A2,
where A1 and A2 represent the abatement of phosphorus effluents in pounds by Source 1 and Source 2, respectively, and TAC and MAC are measured in hundreds of dollars.
Assume that the state environmental authority has set the total maximum daily load (TMDL) for the Fox River. To achieve this limit, 40 pounds of phosphorus must be abated across the two point sources. Use this information to answer the following questions.
a. If a uniform abatement standard is used by the regulatory authority, what would be the dollar values of TAC and MAC for each source?
b. Based on your answer to part (a), is there an economic incentive for the sources to participate in the trading program? Explain briefly.
c. Quantify the cost savings associated with a cost-effective abatement allocation achieved through trading.
d. What should be the price level of the tradable permits to achieve the cost-effective solution?
Correct Answer:

Verified
1a. Based on a uniform abatement standar...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: Under U.S. law, the technology-based effluent limitations
Q2: According to the textbook application, efforts to
Q3: All point sources are subject to effluent
Q5: If water quality law prevents the achievement
Q6: A volume-based effluent fee is based on
Q7: An advantage of the effluent limitations is
Q8: Empirical research indicates that federal grants added
Q9: Among the identified point sources contributing to
Q10: From an economic perspective, the zero discharge
Q11: Tradeable effluent permit markets can lead to