Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case of U.S.v.Park,the case in which the defendant,the president of a national food-chain corporation,claimed he should not be held liable for allowing food in a warehouse to be exposed to rodent contamination because he had delegated responsibility to subordinates?
A) The court dismissed all claims against him because of insufficient proof of negligence.
B) The court refused to dismiss claims against him because of insufficient proof of delegation.
C) The court dismissed all claims against him because of insufficient proof that he had actively allowed contamination.
D) The court refused to dismiss claims against him because of proof that he had responsibility and authority to prevent the contamination or to correct it and failed to do so.
E) The court refused to dismiss claims against him because the offense was a strict liability offense.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: Which of the following occurs when someone
Q37: By which of Dr.Eli's actions,if any,did he
Q38: Of which of the following must a
Q39: Which of the following is described as
Q40: Which amendment provides the right to a
Q42: A person who is considered an infant
Q43: Which of the following is the secretive
Q44: Which of the following allows a defendant
Q45: Which of the following is a plea
Q46: Government inspectors may never legally enter a