Multiple Choice
Louisa decides to go on a zip line adventure.She signs a contract before she begins to go on the zip line,which says that she assumes the risks of accident or injury.While walking up the steps to grab the zip line,Louisa falls down due to a broken hand rail on the stairs.Could the property owner be held responsible?
A) Yes because she had not yet started zip lining but after she actually grabbed the line,the company would no longer be held responsible.
B) Yes,because a fall due to a faulty handrail was not the type of risk Louisa thought she was assuming.
C) No because of Louisa's implied assumption of the risk.
D) No because Louisa fell on her own.
E) No because of Louisa's express assumption of the risk.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: When negligence per se applies, the plaintiff
Q18: Which of the following applies to cases
Q19: Breach of duty in a negligence case
Q20: Which of the following are elements of
Q21: Legally speaking,do individuals have a general duty
Q22: Duty in a negligence case refers to
Q24: Pavel should seek which of the following
Q26: It is a generally accepted precaution for
Q27: Did Claudia and Sam have a duty
Q28: Which of the following damages are intended