Multiple Choice
What was the final result on appeal in the Case Opener involving whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied to the lawsuit brought against landowners after the plaintiff fell through a wooden dock located on the defendants' property?
A) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because it only applies in contractual cases.
B) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied.
C) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the type of accident at issue would not normally happen in the absence of negligence.
D) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the dock at issue was in the exclusive control of the defendants.
E) That whether or not the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied should be decided by the jury.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: When negligence per se applies, the plaintiff
Q24: Pavel should seek which of the following
Q26: It is a generally accepted precaution for
Q27: Did Claudia and Sam have a duty
Q28: Which of the following damages are intended
Q30: Clients who feel that they have suffered
Q31: Which of the following is an example
Q32: In order to rely upon the defense
Q33: Which type of damages are NOT available
Q69: Good Samaritan statutes impose liability upon people