Multiple Choice
Did Rogerio have a duty to provide assistance to Tamika and Billy during the dive?
A) Rogerio had a duty to come to their assistance only if no one else did so.
B) Rogerio had a duty to come to their assistance only if they were minors.
C) Rogerio had a duty to come to their assistance only if he had specifically agreed to do so prior to the dive.
D) Rogerio had a duty to come to their aid because he arranged the dive and was charging them.
E) Rogerio had no duty to provide any assistance to them.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Generally speaking,courts hold that landowners have a
Q49: Under which of the following does the
Q50: Which statement about negligence in Germany is
Q51: What is the term for when a
Q52: Which of the following occurs when a
Q54: Proximate cause is determined by ,in most
Q55: Which of the following is an example
Q56: Which of the following is a condition
Q57: [Diving Fiasco] Rogerio,who owns a dive shop
Q58: "But for" causation refers to which of