Multiple Choice
What was the ruling of the court in the case of Welge v.Planters Lifesavers Co. ,the case in which the plaintiff injured his hand when a jar containing peanuts broke?
A) That the case would be dismissed because the plaintiff could not establish that the jar was maintained in a pristine condition after its purchase.
B) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed on his claim because negligence was established.
C) That the plaintiff would be allowed to proceed on his claim because the defendant was unable to establish that the jar had been damaged after its purchase.
D) That the plaintiff was unable to recover on his claim because he was not the actual purchaser of the jar of peanuts.
E) That the plaintiff was unable to recover on his claim because negligence in manufacture of the jar could not be established.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: With regard to Julia's blog,what defense could
Q24: [Disappointing Boat Purchase] Ava went to purchase
Q25: In a state that allows the contributory
Q26: What four factors did the U.S.Supreme Court
Q27: When a plaintiff cannot trace an injury
Q29: Which of the following causes of action
Q30: [Allergy Injuries] Drug company ABC Drugs introduced
Q31: Under a strict product liability theory,who is
Q32: Negligence per se is the same thing
Q33: Under a strict product liability theory,who may