What Was the Result in the Text's Case Involving a Plaintiff

Multiple Choice

What was the result in the text's case involving a plaintiff who suffered permanent liver damages as a result of drinking a glass of wine with a Tylenol capsule?

A) For plaintiff,because no comparative negligence was found.
B) For defendant,because the plaintiff's adverse reaction from the ingestion of only one capsule was extremely rare.
C) For defendant,because it had no duty to warn.
D) For plaintiff,because the degree of potential harm was substantial and it would have been easy to place a warning.
E) For defendant,because there was no proof of market share.