Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result on appeal in In Re Simon Shiao Tam,the case in the text involving a challenge to the Lanham Act's requirement that a mark not be disparaging?
A) The court found the disparagement requirement to be constitutional under the First Amendment,but because the mark was derogatory,affirmed the government's denial of the "Slants" mark.
B) The court found the disparagement requirement to be unconstitutional under the First Amendment,but affirmed the government's denial of the "Slants" mark.
C) The court found the disparagement requirement did not violate the First Amendment,but refused to comment on whether or not the "Slants" mark was disparaging.
D) The court found the disparagement requirement to be unconstitutional under the First Amendment,thus the denial of the "Slants" mark was vacated.
E) The court found the disparagement requirement to be constitutional under the First Amendment,thus the denial of the "Slants" mark was affirmed.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Typically, a plaintiff does not need to
Q57: The Council of European Communities adopted a
Q58: In states that have patent local rules,which
Q59: As referenced in the case in the
Q60: A trademark must be registered with the
Q63: China's lax enforcement of intellectual property laws
Q64: Which of the following is true regarding
Q65: _ occurs when a mark is used
Q66: Which of the following is the oldest
Q67: Saya claims Ramona's patent is invalid because