Flo Claims That Pink Was Proper Under Section 29,and Any

Multiple Choice

Flo claims that pink was proper under Section 29,and any court would interpret the contract in Flo's favor.Would Section 29 likely be enforced?

A) Yes,Serena should have read the contract more carefully and,if there were any ambiguity,she should have clarified it prior to signing.
B) Yes,Section 29 should be interpreted according to its plain language.
C) Yes,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Serena.
D) No,Section 29 is ambiguous and should be interpreted against Flo.
E) Yes,Serena signed the contract.