Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case discussed in the text Andrus v.State Department of Transportation,and City of Olympia in which the plaintiff sued because a job offer was allegedly revoked?
A) The plaintiff won because the city had validly offered him a job and had no right to revoke it.
B) The defendant won because the purported job offer contained insufficient information to be considered reasonably certain in regard to its terms.
C) The defendant won because it had truly received a bad reference.
D) The plaintiff won because,while there was no contract,the court ruled that the city was not allowed to mislead him on equitable grounds and also on grounds of unlawful discrimination.
E) The defendant won because the plaintiff had not specifically accepted the job.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Emily asks Sasha if Sasha would consider
Q49: In which of the following ways may
Q50: What is the likely result in the
Q51: [Used Car Sales] Edwin sells used cars.He
Q52: If no means of communicating an acceptance
Q54: Which of the following was the result
Q56: Which of the following is true of
Q57: What should an offeror do if it
Q58: Which of the following is true when
Q84: An invitation to negotiate is an offer