Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in the Case Nugget in the text involving the dispute between Dr.Ralph M.Aurigemma and New Castle Care,LLC,involving whether an oral agreement entered into on September 4 involving Dr.Aurigemma serving as medical director from October 1 of that year until October 1 of the next year was enforceable?
A) That the contract was not in writing and,therefore,could not be enforced.
B) That the contract could be enforced because of the parol evidence rule.
C) That the contract was enforceable because of the partial-performance exception to the statute of frauds.
D) That the contract could not be enforced because of the parol evidence rule.
E) That the contract was enforceable because agreements for professional services do not come within the protection of the statute of frauds.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: [Courtroom Surprises] Alexandra agrees to sell Rishi
Q2: What is a purpose of the parol
Q3: [RV and bike deal] For his retirement,Milton
Q5: Regarding Rishi getting a loan and putting
Q7: Regarding Damian's assertion that the statute of
Q8: All courts consider merger clauses to be
Q11: Under which of the following circumstances would
Q44: Define the term "admission" in relation to
Q47: What are the eight exceptions to the
Q74: When a contract is incomplete, a court