Multiple Choice
Regarding Gabriel's promises to Rachel of a Mercedes and a trip,which of the following is true?
A) The promises fall within the statute of frauds.
B) The promises do not fall within the statute of frauds because they involve material matters,not matters involving home and children.
C) The promises would have fallen within the statute of frauds in earlier times in history,but would not fall within the statute of frauds in this day and time.
D) The promises do not fall within the statute of frauds unless Rachel can prove that she would not have married Gabriel without the assurance of the Mercedes and the trip.
E) The promises fall within the statute of frauds unless Gabriel can prove that Rachel would have married him without the assurance of the Mercedes and the trip.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: All parties to a contract must sign
Q51: A[n] agreement is an agreement two parties
Q52: [Not So Rich Uncle] Gabriel is attempting
Q53: In the "parol evidence rule," what does
Q54: Which of the following contracts would fall
Q58: A[n] is a statement made in court,under
Q59: On February 1,Dorian Winn,a publisher,hires Travis to
Q60: Whenever a written agreement under the statute
Q60: Under the Agent Negotiation rule,if a contract
Q61: What was the result in Heritage Constructors,Inc.v.Chrietzberg