Multiple Choice
Kendra owns a sporting goods store.She is in court because of a breach of contract lawsuit against her supplier.One of the terms of the contract is ambiguous.Would the court likely permit Kendra to testify as to oral conversations about the ambiguous terms of the contract?
A) No,but she could provide additional writings.
B) No,because there is a written contract.
C) No,because it would modify the contract.
D) Yes,but only to clarify the ambiguous contract terms.
E) Yes,where ambiguous terms exist,she may provide oral evidence that modifies the contract.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: In the U.S., the requirements for what
Q27: Parol evidence is admissible when a court
Q42: Within the statute of frauds,"land" encompasses not
Q43: What did the appellate court rule in
Q45: Colin and Natalie orally agreed with Medical
Q48: Which of the following statements is true
Q49: Which of the following is not a
Q50: What is necessary in order to satisfy
Q51: A[n] agreement is an agreement two parties
Q52: [Not So Rich Uncle] Gabriel is attempting