Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in the case in the text,Novamedix,Limited v.NDM Acquisition Corporation and Vesta Healthcare,Inc. ,in which the plaintiff claimed that a settlement agreement was a contract for the sale of goods breached by the defendant because a type of medical slipper involved in the settlement agreement could not be resold?
A) That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because it was a mixed type of transaction.
B) That the transaction would be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because it was a mixed type of transaction.
C) That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because of the involvement of medical treatment issues.
D) That the transaction would not be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because the predominant purpose of the settlement agreement was to settle a patent infringement lawsuit.
E) That the transaction would be treated as a contract for the sale of goods because the essential nature of the agreement was the exchange of slippers for the release of a legal right.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q14: The parol evidence rule aims to protect
Q63: Which of the following is a special
Q64: For businesses that operate in the global
Q65: Under the UCC,when is an acceptance effective?<br>A)When
Q66: Under Article 2 of the UCC,which of
Q69: Which of the following is true regarding
Q70: The UCC pertains to all business transactions.
Q71: When courts interpret sales and lease contracts,how
Q72: Under the UCC,when will additional terms negate
Q73: Which of the following is true regarding