Multiple Choice
Which of the following is true regarding Emilia's assertion that she should be allowed to recover from the baseball coach?
A) Based upon the facts given,Emilia cannot recover because the coach was not a merchant in regards to the transaction and had not signed anything showing that he was to be charged for the caps.
B) Emilia can recover only if she can prove by testimony of a witness that the coach received the confirmation letter and read it.
C) Emilia can recover because she sent the coach a confirmation letter,and he did not object within 10 days of receipt.
D) Emilia can recover because she sent the coach a confirmation letter,and he did not object within 20 days of receipt.
E) Emilia can recover because the transaction was not covered by the UCC.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: What was the court's ruling in Loizeaux
Q3: What was the court's ruling in DeWeldon.Ltd.v.McKean,the
Q5: Which statement is false regarding the United
Q8: Under the UCC,contracts for the sale of
Q9: [Carpet Woes] Joaquin went shopping at ABC
Q10: Which of the following terms is defined
Q11: According to Exhibit 21-5 in the text,if
Q23: What is required in order for an
Q56: Under what circumstances does the parol evidence
Q77: The Uniform Internet Act was adopted by