Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case of Webster v.Blue Ship Tea Room Inc. ,the case in which the plaintiff sued after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating fish chowder?
A) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of merchantability.
B) That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.
C) That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
D) That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish and should have been expected.
E) That the plaintiff could recover based on either breach of an express warranty or breach of the implied warranty of merchantability.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Express warranties are not material terms of
Q38: If it is generally accepted in the
Q39: Gabby ordered T-shirts for her soccer team
Q39: The purchaser or lessee must have purchased
Q40: In the text case,Welchert v.American Cyanamid Inc.
Q42: Under the UCC which of the following
Q44: [Hot Toaster] Cara bought a toaster from
Q45: Which of the following is true regarding
Q47: Which of the following types of warranties
Q48: Tanya lives with her sister Jane and