Multiple Choice
[Defaulted Loan] Bruce wanted to open his own restaurant,The Burger Bar,and called his friend Janet for a loan.Janet orally agreed to loan Bruce $200,000.The agreement was not put into writing.Two years later,the loan was never repaid and is in default.The Burger Bar is bankrupt and Janet decides to sue Bruce in his individual capacity.
-If the reasoning of the case in the text,Athanasios Valsamis v.Néstor Gonzáles-Romero is followed,what would Janet have to prove in court?
A) Janet does not have to prove anything,as the burden would shift to Bruce to prove an agreement did not exist.
B) Janet must prove money is due and Bruce is the responsible party.
C) Janet must prove money is due.
D) Janet must prove money is due and The Burger Bar is the responsible party.
E) Janet must prove The Burger Bar is the responsible party.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: In order to satisfy the requirement of
Q67: List the seven requirements for an instrument
Q78: A note is a promise, by the
Q81: Under the UCC,what role does Auto Repair
Q83: [Used Car Commission] William promised to sell
Q84: What is the UCC's definition of an
Q85: What is the effect of Hye agreeing
Q87: Which of the following is a draft
Q88: Which of the following is not a
Q90: Which is the correct term for a