Multiple Choice
Which statement is true regarding the bank manager saying that the bank could not incur any liability for damages for the failure to stop payment on a check?
A) The manager is incorrect,and the bank will incur liability or damages suffered by a customer due to the failure to stop payment when a stop-payment order was properly provided,but only up to $1,000.
B) The manager is correct.
C) The manager is incorrect,and the bank will incur liability or damages suffered by a customer due to the failure to stop payment when a stop-payment order was properly provided.
D) The manager is incorrect,and the bank will incur liability or damages suffered by a customer due to the failure to stop payment when a stop-payment order was properly provided,but only up to $500.
E) The manager is incorrect,and the bank will incur liability or damages suffered by a customer due to the failure to stop payment when a stop-payment order was properly provided,but only up to $1,500.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: In India, unlike in the United States,
Q40: An oral stop payment order is valid
Q42: Assuming the bank is not negligent,in the
Q43: When the depositary bank is the same
Q45: Is Ariel correct that the EFT charge
Q46: When the payor and payee have accounts
Q49: Which of the following is the party
Q59: A stop payment order should list which
Q66: The UCC states that a customer can
Q75: The depositary bank is sometimes the same