Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Cameron v.Ewing,the case in the text involving whether monthly proceeds from a reverse mortgage were subject to garnishment?
A) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the payments did not constitute earned income.
B) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because the defendant's estate was ultimately liable to repay the monies received to the extent repayment could be generated from sale of the property.
C) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment based on public policy and also that the claimant was entitled to the full amount of the monthly payments.
D) The court ruled that the payments were not subject to garnishment because it would be against public policy to find as such.
E) The court ruled that the payments were subject to garnishment because the payments constituted debts due the defendant.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: If a creditor brings legal action against
Q46: When considering whether a secured party or
Q80: Which of the following is true if
Q81: The agreement entered into between Sean and
Q83: What is the effect of Sean's bankruptcy,if
Q84: Which of the following is the most
Q85: Which of the following may occur when
Q87: When must a lienholder's claim on a
Q88: [Defective Windows] Cecelia hired a contractor,Paul,to put
Q89: Why is it important for a creditor