Multiple Choice
In In re Estate of Kurrelmeyer,the case in the text in which the decedent's son sued the wife of the decedent,alleging that in violation of the power of attorney that she held,she invalidly transferred the decedent's home into a trust,which of the following was the result on appeal?
A) That based on extrinsic evidence showing the decedent's intent,the power of attorney included the power to transfer the property.
B) That because no extrinsic evidence existed to clarify the meaning of the power of attorney,the transfer was valid.
C) That because no extrinsic evidence existed to clarify the meaning of the power of attorney,the transfer was invalid.
D) That based on extrinsic evidence showing the decedent's intent,the power of attorney did not include the power to transfer the property.
E) That because the power of attorney did not specifically give the wife the power to transfer property into the trust,the transfer was invalid.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: A special power of attorney grants the
Q64: Actual notice of agency termination may not
Q65: Which doctrine applies in the context of
Q66: Which of the following is true regarding
Q67: Which of the following is true regarding
Q68: If Pat sues Night Club for his
Q70: Which of the following is true regarding
Q71: What is the rationale behind vicarious liability?<br>A)The
Q72: As discussed in the text,which of the
Q74: When a principal is classified as a[n]