Multiple Choice
What was the result in Patterson v.Dominos' Pizza,LLC,the case in the text addressing whether a franchisor can be held vicariously liable by a franchisee's employee for sexual harassment,retaliation,and tort claims?
A) The franchisor was vicariously liable for sexual harassment by the franchisee because it was the plaintiff's employer.
B) The franchisor failed to remedy sexual harassment by the franchisee,and thus was vicariously liable.
C) The franchisor was not vicariously liable for sexual harassment by the franchisee because it was not the plaintiff's employer.
D) The case was remanded to the trial court to determine whether the franchisor stands in an employment or agency position in relation to the franchisee and its employees,in order to determine if the plaintiff-employee can pursue her claims against the franchisor.
E) The franchise agreement governed whether or not the franchisor was vicariously liable for sexual harassment by the franchisee.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q16: Define a joint venture and set forth
Q66: Describe a franchise that is a distributorship
Q78: Which of the following statements is correct
Q79: Which of the following offers the tax
Q80: What is the most popular form of
Q81: What was the result in Meyer v.Christie,the
Q82: Under which of the following types of
Q85: Will Rashi likely be held liable to
Q86: In which of the following does the
Q87: From which of the following countries did