Multiple Choice
Which of the following statements is true regarding the result of the dispute in the Case Opener involving whether a joint venture between law firms was liable for the actions of a partner sanctioned for litigation misconduct?
A) That the law firms were not liable because on the basis of the independent management of the law firms involved,no joint venture actually existed.
B) That a joint venture existed and that members could be held liable for a partner's misconduct while acting in the ordinary course of the joint venture's business.
C) That because a joint venture is defined as a multiple-purpose partnership,the participants could be held liable,but only if the misconduct stemmed from activities engaged in on behalf of the joint venture.
D) That while a joint venture existed,vicarious liability could not be asserted in order to hold members of a joint venture vicariously liable for a partner's misconduct.
E) That because a joint venture is defined as a multiple-purpose LLC,the participants could not be held liable regardless of whether the misconduct stemmed from activities engaged in on behalf of the joint venture.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: Which of the following was the result
Q54: Is Cruz correct that he is entitled
Q55: Which of the following is true under
Q56: Which of the following statements is false
Q57: Where no partnership agreement exists,will a court
Q59: In the absence of a partnership agreement,what
Q60: Does Leo have any obligation to tell
Q61: Unless otherwise agreed by the partners,where are
Q63: Unless otherwise agreed in the articles of
Q77: [Car Repair] Gordon and Leo are partners