Is Seth's Statement True Concerning the Need for Psychological Counseling

Multiple Choice

Is Seth's statement true concerning the need for psychological counseling to prevail on a sexual harassment claim?

A) Yes,a plaintiff is only excused from showing a tangible psychological injury in a claim involving sexual harassment if the plaintiff can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that severe and pervasive harassment frequently occurred.
B) Yes,a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless the plaintiff can show that the harassment caused the plaintiff monetary harm in the form of lost wages because of inability to work.
C) No,a plaintiff is not required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim.
D) Yes,a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on a sexual harassment claim unless an independent witness can corroborate on an objective basis that sexual harassment actually occurred.
E) Yes,a plaintiff is required to show a tangible psychological injury in order to prevail on any sexual discrimination or sexual harassment claim.