Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in the Case Opener,the case in which the company was found to have generated waste with excessive concentrations of PCBs?
A) That the company had no liability because it was the responsibility of the federal government to clean up the waste.
B) That the company was liable under federal law because it failed to clean up the hazardous area in a timely manner.
C) That the company was liable because it failed to monitor in a manner that would have revealed the waste in a timely manner.
D) That the company had no liability because it was the responsibility of the state government to clean up the waste.
E) That the company had no liability because it had not intentionally generated the waste.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: Once the administrator of the EPA establishes
Q27: Under FIFRA,what happens if a pesticide cannot
Q28: A company develops a new mosquito spray
Q29: Which of the following is a federal
Q31: In a recent study that ranked 142
Q32: Regarding Sean's statement that the state had
Q33: If emissions standards are established for cars
Q34: Significantly reducing,and in some countries banning,the use
Q79: Phasing out environmentally harmful action through the
Q90: Every environmental impact statement must contain a