Multiple Choice
What was the effect of Samuel's statement that Keisha should take everything,assuming he was of sound mind?
A) His statement was ineffective to revoke his prior will only because he was angry when he made it.
B) His statement was ineffective to revoke his prior will only because he believed he was dying at the time he made it.
C) His statement would likely be upheld as an oral will because he made the statement during his last illness in front of witnesses who later wrote down his wishes.
D) Because a will is not usually required to be in writing,his statement was effective to revoke any prior will.
E) Because a will must be in writing,his statement has no effect.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: In order to determine death, surgeons in
Q29: The amount a surviving spouse inherits when
Q36: As set forth in the text, for
Q42: Which of the following is the proper
Q43: A testator wrote a will under circumstances
Q44: A _ is a person who creates
Q45: What is the rationale behind the principle
Q46: is a uniform law proposed by the
Q49: [Secretary Visits] Kara wrote a will leaving
Q51: _ is the process of settling an