Ethicists Such as Manuel Velasquez (2011) Argue That Whistle-Blowing Is

Multiple Choice

ethicists such as Manuel Velasquez (2011) argue that whistle-blowing is justified if three conditions are satisfied. One condition is that there is strong evidence that the organization is doing something that is hurting or will hurt other parties. What are the other two conditions?

A) The employee has made a serious but unsuccessful attempt to resolve the problem through internal channels.
B) Whistle-blowing is reasonably certain to prevent or stop the wrongdoing.
C) The employee has suffered personal harm as a result of the wrongdoing, such as the loss of a promotion, a substantial decrease in salary, or physical injury.
D) The wrongdoing involves members of a minority group or affects individuals granted specific rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act.