Multiple Choice
The case of Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of South Australia Incorporated (2001) 209 CLR 95 is authority for the principle that:
A) Intention to create an enforceable agreement remains an essential precondition to contractual liability in Australia.
B) The category of social or domestic agreements now includes religious institutions.
C) The existence of intention to create an enforceable agreement is a question of fact.
D) Intention to create an enforceable agreement is no longer an essential precondition to contractual liability in Australia.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: In which type of agreement is the
Q6: The existence or an intention to create
Q10: A subjective test is used to determine
Q12: In relation to the question of whether
Q24: A 'rebuttable' presumption is:<br>A) One which can
Q25: In which of the following cases did
Q28: The decision in Jones v Vernon Pools
Q32: In which of the following cases did
Q34: When a business advertises their product, the
Q37: The law presumes that in social agreements