Multiple Choice
The decision in Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1986) 162 CLR 479 means that:
A) Occupiers of property owe a duty of care to anyone who enters their premises.
B) The duty of an occupier varies with the circumstances of a person's entry.
C) An occupier's duty of care is measured by their response to a foreseeable risk.
D) All of the above.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: In Deatons v Flew (1949)79 CLR 370,why
Q9: In which case did the House of
Q15: It is easier to take action against
Q18: Vicarious liability can make a person liable
Q19: Occupiers never owe a trespasser a duty
Q21: A 'non-delegable' duty of care is:<br>A) Less
Q23: Pure economic loss means there is no
Q23: Under the civil liability acts, the definition
Q24: An employer will be vicariously liable for
Q25: To establish a case of occupier's liability,