Multiple Choice
In Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, the manufacturer:
A) Was liable to the customer under the product liability law.
B) Was not liable to the customer for breach of an implied term in the contract.
C) Was not liable because the customer had the opportunity to inspect the product.
D) Was liable for breach of duty of care owed to the customer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: In which case did the House of
Q10: A person who suffers injury as a
Q23: Under the civil liability acts, the definition
Q24: An employer will be vicariously liable for
Q25: To establish a case of occupier's liability,
Q28: What is meant by the term 'vicarious
Q29: What is occupier's liability?
Q30: The decision in <i>Burnie Port Authority v
Q32: Who is the 'occupier' of premises?<br>A) The
Q33: Following the decision in Esanda Finance Corporation