Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in the Twin

Multiple Choice

Which of the following was the result on appeal in The Twin City Bank v. Kenneth Isaacs, the case in the text in which the bank appealed a judgment against it for significant damages after the bank wrongfully held funds of depositors who had been the victim of check forgery?

A) That the bank could not be held liable for damages because it was recouping its own losses.
B) That the bank could not be held liable under common law because of its contractual agreement with the depositors and that the UCC was inapplicable.
C) That the bank could be held liable but only up to $1,000.
D) That the bank could be held liable for actual damages but not for mental anguish.
E) That the bank could be held liable for financial losses and also for mental anguish.