Multiple Choice
Reference - Boat Tow. Donnie went to a new car dealership and told the salesperson, who was not the manager, that he needed a new car that would get good gas mileage and would also pull his big boat. The salesperson encouraged him to buy a smaller car that the salesperson promised would pull the boat. Donnie bought the car and used it to pull the boat. Unfortunately, the heavy pull on the car did significant damage to the car's engine. Donnie complained to the salesperson who denied any liability. Donnie, who had half a semester of business law, informed the salesperson that along with the sale of the car he also received an express warranty and an implied warranty of merchantability, and that he could recover under either of those theories. Will Donnie likely be able to recover damages based upon a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability?
A) No, because the implied warranty of merchantability was that the car would, for example, be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used. Pulling the boat was not an ordinary purpose for that small car.
B) Yes, because Donnie informed the salesperson about the need for the car to pull the boat.
C) Yes, because the salesperson told Donnie that the car would pull the boat.
D) No, because of the lack of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
E) No, because there was no warranty of merchantability.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Specific performance usually requires that the seller
Q17: An express warranty is any description of
Q58: Belinda orders a certain type of hybrid
Q76: When was the Magnuson-Moss Act passed?<br>A) 1950<br>B)
Q83: What does the UCC provide regarding liquidated
Q84: The UCC does not allow a seller
Q85: Which of the following is true regarding
Q86: Under the UCC which of the following
Q91: Priscilla, who worked for a dry cleaner,
Q93: Mary sells handmade earrings for a living.