Multiple Choice
What was the result in Scott v. Mid-Carolina Homes, Inc., the case in the text in which the defendant attempted to rescind a contract to sell a mobile home because its salesperson was acting under a mistake of fact when he gave the plaintiff the sales price?
A) The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because a unilateral contract was involved.
B) The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because a bilateral contract was involved.
C) The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because the mistake involved a price differential of over 25%.
D) The seller was allowed to rescind the contract because the mistake involved a price differential of over 50%.
E) The seller was not allowed to rescind the contract.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Reference - Scheming Friends. Willy very much
Q49: Which of the following involves the active
Q51: Reference - Pet Pig Farm. Marcy wanted
Q52: Under what condition or conditions will a
Q53: Which of the following occurs when one
Q54: Which of the following occur(s)when a party
Q55: Undue influence refers to those special relationships
Q63: Although there are some exceptions, a[n] _
Q71: What was the result in the Peerless
Q73: Threatening physical harm or extortion to gain