Multiple Choice
What was the result in the case nugget, Lefkowitz v. Great Minneapolis Surplus Store, Inc., involving an advertisement for the sale of fur coats?
A) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it involved a luxury good.
B) The court ruled that the advertisement was an offer but that the customer who was suing had not properly accepted it.
C) The court ruled that the advertisement was not an offer because it was a ridiculously low offer which the plaintiff should have known was not to be taken seriously.
D) The court ruled that the ad was not an offer because ads are never offers, only invitations for customers to make an offer.
E) The court ruled that the ad was an offer and that the plaintiff properly accepted it.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: Which of the following is false regarding
Q7: In which of the following does a
Q11: Discuss the meaning of a void contract
Q41: If the subject matter of an offer
Q48: An offeror has no right to terminate
Q50: Set forth the ways in which an
Q51: Which of the following is the first
Q52: Inez, wishing to sell a used business
Q56: In a _ contract, the offeror wants
Q58: Reference - Saturday Auction. Barry, an auctioneer,