In 2003 the Supreme Court Clarified the Decision Cited in the Previous

Multiple Choice

In 2003 the Supreme Court clarified the decision cited in the previous question by holding that cross-burning is not protected by the First Amendment if it can be shown that it was intended to intimidate anyone.The 2003 case:

A) R.A.V.v.St.Paul.
B) Virginia v.Black.
C) Wisconsin v.Mitchell.
D) Scheidler v.National Organization for Women.
E) Ward v.Rock Against Racism.