Solved

How Did Dun & Bradstreet V

Question 17

Multiple Choice

How did Dun & Bradstreet v.Greenmoss Builders affect the actual malice rule?


A) it didn't affect it.
B) it exempted public figures from the actual malice requirement.
C) it exempted private persons from the actual malice requirement.
D) it excluded libel cases involving purely private matters (rather than issues of public concern) from the actual malice requirement.
E) it abolished the actual malice requirement.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q12: In the 1991 case of Masson v.New

Q13: Some well-known people are treated as private

Q14: Who may be sued for libel when

Q15: In Seaton v.TripAdvisor,LLC,the appellate court said that

Q16: Former Agricultural Department employee Shirley Sherrod sued

Q18: The Supreme Court extended the actual malice

Q19: In lawsuits involving public issues that are

Q20: The SPEECH Act (Securing the Protection of

Q21: The Supreme Court ruled that appellate courts

Q22: A number of states have enacted anti-SLAPP