Multiple Choice
Exhibit 17-4
-Which of the following could not have caused the increase in demand indicated in Exhibit 17-4?
A) new firms located on the river
B) the pollution was discovered to be more hazardous than had previously been supposed
C) the cost of pollution abatement equipment rose
D) consumers wanted to buy more of the good produced by the polluters
E) the government subsidized firms so they could better afford to buy pollution rights
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q11: Exhibit 17-6<br><img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4914/.jpg" alt="Exhibit 17-6
Q18: Exhibit 17-5 <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB4914/.jpg" alt="Exhibit 17-5
Q47: When consumption of a good creates positive
Q72: When using the traditional command-and-control approach to
Q87: The marginal social benefit of air quality<br>A)declines
Q132: Air pollution is more dangerous to the
Q140: The most likely reason why Los Angeles
Q143: A person can cause a negative externality
Q172: According to Coase,<br>A)government regulation will almost always
Q190: When the benefits to society of using