Essay
Based only on the information provided for each scenario, determine whether Kristi or Cindy will benefit more from using the timing strategy and why there will be a benefit to that person.
a. Kristi has a 40% tax rate and can defer $20,000 of income. Cindy has a 30% tax rate and can defer $30,000 of income.
b. Kristy has a 30% tax rate, a 10% after-tax rate of return, and can defer $25,000 of income for three years. Cindy has a 40% tax rate, an 8% after-tax rate of return, and can defer $20,000 of income for four years.
Correct Answer:

Verified
(a) Cindy, because she can defer $9,000 ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q42: The business purpose, step-transaction, and substance-over-form doctrines
Q44: Compare and contrast the constructive receipt doctrine
Q59: Lucinda is contemplating a long-range planning strategy
Q67: The timing strategy is particularly effective for
Q89: Which of the following is not required
Q90: Investing in municipal bonds to avoid paying
Q91: The value of a tax deduction is
Q92: Rolando's employer pays year-end bonuses each year
Q94: Assuming an after-tax rate of return of
Q96: Which of the following strategies is based